Skip to main content

What is Nintendo Doing Right?

Nintendo, in the eighties and nineties, was the biggest, and most popular video game company. Nintendo dominated the market at the time, releasing many pig title games, and later in the nineties, making the first 64 bit graphics.

Since then, X-Boxes and Playstations have trounced Nintendo’s consoles indefinitely in graphics and gameplay. Yet, Nintendo still seams to remain popular, and even passes x-box in sales.

Both Microsoft and Sony are missing the vital part to consoles, the part that Nintendo has nailed every time: Multiplayer. I am not talking about WAN multiplayer here, I am talking about multiplayer that is played with strictly the people in the room. All of the Nintendo consoles have been made with the local multiplayer theme in mind.

Since computers have been good enough to run games, there is zero reason to play a game on a console; unless there is price involved, consoles are much cheaper than that of a computer of comparable performance. Computers are much easier to handle, can run a ton of other programs, like a music player or a web browser, and has the ability for modifications. No, consoles today must be made for local multiplayer; and Nintendo has been getting it spot-on every time.

Take the Wii. The Wii came with a remote, and a game. The remote was built to be easily utilized for arcade games, with its plethora of different button types, and its single-hand grip. The game, Wii Sports, was built for multiple players; hardly ever was there a game made by Nintendo that could not be played with two players.

Nintendo, on March First, will be releasing a new console/game pad/game system called the Nintendo Switch. Nintendo has built the whatever you want to call it for local multiplayer, but has also built it for single player, and has done so knowing exactly the reasons for the two. The multiplayer being the PC argument, and single player being the price argument.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

An Open Letter To Valve and the TF Team

Dear Valve, It is no question that your match making service for TF2 is horrible. Players are met with long wait times, unbalanced matches, and matches the end as soon as they get there. Players, much like me, get infuriated about how i get matched onto a loosing team at towards the end of the round every time . you need to change something about this process, Team Fortress Two is loosing players because of it. Before the Matchmaking Update Before the Matchmaking update, the "Valve Servers" were searchable servers that the client-slash-player could choose from. Servers would never stop, and players could set the round to be whatever map they wanted. Experiences players would join them to use the non experiences players as cannon fodder, and the non experiences players would join because they didn't know how to use the game yet. You most likely changed the way players join servers for this reason, so that newer players could go up against players that wouldn't ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Late Shift

Some people say we're all connected, all part of a bigger picture; some harmonious flow, endless and meaningful. Maybe that's how it looks from a distance; but up close, with eyes open, I see no evidence of some spiritual choreographer at work. No, I see nothing but random fractals of a selfish, queenless hive. -Exert of the opening narration suggesting that the player is an omniscient, "spiritual choreographer" WARNING: I try to keep it to a minimum, but there are still spoilers. For the last two weeks, I have been playing a game called late Shift . Late Shift is the first choose your own adventure game, and originally came out in April of 2016. About a year after that, it was released on steam; the game looked interesting, so I bought it. I found multiple parts of the game, and its platform interesting, and I wanted to share them The trailer for Late Shift is below. There is language that may be considered offensive to younger audiences. Firs...
Post a Comment
Read more

Net Neutrality

Sigh... I really do not want to comment on this. It's never a good idea to get political; getting political makes people who don't agree with your views stop consuming your content, and people who agree with your values pressure you into saying things that you do not want, which will cause all of the previous. I will try to be as unbiased as possible. I live in the United States, so I will be writing from an American perspective, and using current events in American politics; however, this is still an issue that applies to everyone. What is Net Neutrality Net neutrality is the principle that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all [legal] traffic on the Internet equally; no service receiving better or worse treatment. What is a violation of net neutrality Take a person who desires to search Google for "hilarious cats failing jumps" or whatever. With net neutrality in place, the person's ISP is forced to treat Google equally as all ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Well, I Was Wrong

The simplest way of doing this [defending against malicious synchronization] is by having each of the servers send each other the data that they receive from the others. This will allow each of the servers to compare the data, and figure out if it is manipulated. Only one check is needed because it is majority prof this way; as long as the majority of the servers are reporting the correct data, the individual servers can judge vote whether to kick a client or not. - One Twenty Eight, April 10 th , 2017, 5 AM GMT, in this post Quick Note I use the words "server" and "player" interchangeably; this article is focused on the type of decentralized server that has one server per player. Nope Umm... No. That is not right. That is definitely not right. In case you did not read that article, I went over the technicalities of a decentralized video game round. During this, I declared that as long as the majority of servers are reporting accurate data, t...
Post a Comment
Read more